It's an Ariel Adams job which, under normal circumstances, I wouldn't link to. But he seems to be the first to review this watch.



http://www.ablogtowatch.com/bulova-accu ... ch-review/

That's a good looking watch IMOP.

That is an extraordinarily attractive watch. However, at the risk of sounding like an "Automatics Uber Alles" doofus, I would love to see that same watch with an ETA 2824, a Sellita SW-200, or even a Claro 888 movement on board. Why? because I like auto's, that's why. I see a watch like this one, and even though I'm well aware that it honors (or homadges!) the old electronic Spaceview's of yesteryear, I can't help thinking how cool it would be to have a nice Swiss auto movement in it, along with a nice exhibition back so's I can oooh and ahhh like a geek over his first Invicta Seafister...

...I dunno; maybe I am an "Automatics Uber Alles" doofus, after all.

//MORT OUT//

It does have the sharp super smooth sweep second hand.

These have stripped down Precisionist movements.

Attractive watch. AA's review videos are annoying. He could say all that needs to be said in 60-90 seconds but always drags it out for five minutes or more. Argh!!!

I don't own a Precisionist movement watch but I like the idea. They are all too damned big though.

Ariel is a douche but I do read it every day just because he is in the mix with the new stuff. That's a nice looker.

mrneddles wrote:Ariel is a douche but I do read it every day just because he is in the mix with the new stuff. That's a nice looker.

I agree about AA. Now for the watch it's nice nothing wrong with it but there is something about that that just makes it meh.